Stumptown Hasn’t Sold Out
After days of rampant internet speculation regarding Stumptowns ownership, a reputable publication did some real journalism to finally uncover some answers. Rumors began after the owner of an east coast coffee roaster, irresponsibly claimed that Stumptown’s owner Duane Sorenson had “sold his life’s work to the highest bidder,” in an “article” for Escquire.com.
Oliver Strand waded through the hysteria, and spoke with Duane to learn more.
“I still own Stumptown,” Mr. Sorenson said in a telephone interview. “I’m still in control of Stumptown, the only thing that’s changed is that I brought in an investor, a buddy of mine, who brought in some money so that I can do the things I want to do.” -NYTimes
While this may not appease all of the doubters calling him a sell-out, there are also people who will never believe President Obama was born in the US. Considering the state of the economy and the costs required to scale from a regional business to a national one, I completely understand the need for investment capital. While they aren’t disclosing the structure of the investment, there’s currently no reason not to take Duane at his word. There seems to be a lot on the horizon for Stumptown, and if they continue supporting farmers and selling great coffee, we should be thanking Alexander Panos and TSG Partners.
[Stumptown] plans to open two coffee bars in Brooklyn, add a bottling facility to its roaster in Red Hook for its cold-brewed coffee and, Duane Sorenson, Stumptown’s founder, says the company will try to open roasters in Chicago and San Francisco. -NYTimes
Read the full article at the New York Times Diner’s Journal. An updated article with some new and developing information has also been published.
[Photo by Todd Stadler]














There’s no doubt in my mind that this was done with the best of intentions, with the idea to expand on what Stumptown was already doing and to do it more, and to do it better.
The fears come from the idea that Stumptown, (and thus Duane) would be beholden to stockholders and investors rather than the company’s stated vision and mission. If Stumptown wanted to move to 100% Direct Trade coffee, for example, if it were a question of “this is the right thing to do in terms of personal and consumer ethics” vs. “that will cause the company to not make as much money”, the fear is that the money would have the priority, as the company is now beholden to stockholders and investors rather than personal vision.
Mind you, with the information that’s come out since the “Stumptown sold out” rumormill started, I don’t believe that this is the case, but nonetheless, this is where our fears come from.